What GPT-5.6 Sol and Gemini 3.7 Flash answered, 2,400 times, to 240 buyer questions about the 30 companies on TOPTech30 2026.

A buyer who asks an AI assistant “which provider should we choose?” gets a short list. We wanted to know how often Estonia’s most valuable technology companies are on it.

We took TOPTech30 2026, the valuation ranking published by Prudentia and Siena Secondary Fund, and measured all 30 companies. For each one we chose one market where it sells, wrote eight buyer questions in that market’s language and asked two AI engines each question five times.

Disclosure. Rankfor.AI sells AI visibility audits and a managed service. Ridango, one of the 30 companies, is a Rankfor.AI customer. Rankfor.AI has sent ten of the companies their own report so far and sends the others theirs on request. The study was not commissioned or paid for by any of the companies or by the publishers of TOPTech30.

The short answer

  • Asked for a shortlist, with the name left out, AI names the company in 453 of 900 answers (50%).
  • Of 90 shortlist questions, 30 name the company in every answer and 29 in none.
  • Six companies are named in every shortlist answer. Five are named in none, in the market measured.
  • Gemini 3.7 Flash names the company in 45% of answers to questions that leave the name out. GPT-5.6 Sol does in 37%.
  • In the 22 companies whose answers we read in full, 11% of citations go to the company’s own pages and 55% to other companies in the market.

Asked for a shortlist, AI names the company in 50% of answers

Half of the shortlists

Each company has three shortlist questions. A buyer describes a need, asks for the top providers and asks which one to choose first. The company’s name, products and domains are left out.

Across 900 answers to those questions, the company is named in 453.

The share falls when the buyer is earlier in the decision. On questions about how a problem is solved, the company is named in 163 of 600 answers (27%). On the question about which route to take, it is named in 127 of 300 (42%).

Across all six questions that leave the name out, the figure is 743 of 1,800 (41%).

For most questions it is every answer or none

We expected companies to be more or less visible. What we found is closer to on or off, question by question.

Of 90 shortlist questions, AI names the company every time in 30 and never in 29

Each of the 90 squares is one shortlist question for one company, asked ten times. In 30 of them the company is named all ten times. In 29 it is never named. 31 sit in between.

Two examples from the reports:

  • Scoro is named in 10 of 10 answers for a marketing agency choosing a professional services platform, and in 0 of 10 for an architecture and engineering practice.
  • Wallester is named in 4 of its 60 answers, and all four answer the same question, from an agency that needs a few hundred virtual cards.

A company that tests one question about itself learns very little. The useful picture is the set of questions its buyers ask.

Six companies every time, five in none

Six companies are named in all 30 of their shortlist answers: Lightyear, Milrem Robotics, Montonio, Pactum, Pipedrive and Wise. Montonio was measured in Estonian for Estonian online shops and Lightyear in Hungarian for Hungarian investors.

Five companies are named in none of theirs: Ark Robotics (Europe), Helmes (Germany), KrattWorks (Europe), Nortal (Germany) and Zobi (United States). That result belongs to the market measured. Helmes and Nortal were measured in Germany, and Ark Robotics and KrattWorks on European defence procurement questions.

Shortlist answers naming each company, out of 30

The rows are separate measurements in alphabetical order. Each company has its own questions, market and competitors.

The two engines disagree

Gemini 3.7 Flash names the company in 408 of 900 answers to questions that leave the name out (45%). GPT-5.6 Sol names it in 335 (37%). On 15 of 180 questions, one engine names the company in at least 4 of 5 answers and the other in at most 1.

Gemini names the company in 45% of answers to questions that leave the name out and GPT-5.6 Sol in 37%

Web search was available for every question. In the 22 companies we read in full, GPT-5.6 Sol returned sources in 652 of 660 answers. Gemini wrote 200 of 660 without searching and named the company in 94 of those.

What we saw in the 22 companies read in full

For 22 companies, two AI coders read every answer and recorded first picks and cited sources. Three things stand out in those 1,760 answers.

Given the name, both engines identify the company. 437 of 440 answers to the questions that name the company describe the right one. The three exceptions are Gemini answers about LEI Register.

Named and picked are separate counts. 703 answers pick one provider first, and the measured company is that pick in 211 (30%). For seven companies it is at least half of the answers that make a pick: Bolt, Katana, Lightyear, Montonio, Pactum, Pipedrive and Ridango (a Rankfor.AI customer).

Other companies’ pages are cited about five times as often as the company’s own. The answers carry 8,616 citations. 55% go to other companies in the market: competitors first, then partners, platforms and customers.

Public bodies and standards receive 15%, the company’s own pages 11%, review and comparison sites 7% and news and trade media 3%.

11% of AI’s citations go to the company’s own pages

The company’s own pages are cited in 439 of 1,320 answers, so their contents are within the engine’s reach.

What a marketing team can do with this

  1. Test the questions buyers ask before they know your name. Use the buyer’s market and language. Ask each question several times and on more than one engine.
  2. List the questions where AI never names you. Each one is a specific buyer and use case. The answers show which companies and sources fill that space.
  3. Check what your own pages say. AI cites company pages in a third of the answers we read in full. Read them as a buyer’s assistant would.

Results by company

CompanyProduct measuredBuyer marketNamed, shortlist answers (of 30)Named, all six questions (of 60)First pick
AdmiralsCFD and forex brokerageGermany (German)993 of 34
Ark RoboticsAutonomy software for unmanned vehicle fleetsEurope (English)00not recorded
BlackwallBot protection for hosting providersGreece (Greek)220 of 29
BoltRide-hailingUnited Kingdom (English)274712 of 22
DefSecIntel SolutionsAutonomous border and site surveillanceEurope (English)56not recorded
ElcogenSolid oxide cells and stacksIndia (English)16267 of 33
Frankenburg TechnologiesCounter-drone interceptor missilesUnited Kingdom (English)2340not recorded
HelmesCustom software developmentGermany (German)000 of 30
HEVI OptronicsElectro-optical surveillance systemsEurope (English)23not recorded
KatanaInventory and manufacturing softwareUnited States (English)285718 of 34
KrattWorksAerial target dronesEurope (English)01not recorded
LEI RegisterLegal entity identifiersUnited Kingdom (English)16233 of 27
LightyearRetail investingHungary (Hungarian)305525 of 27
Milrem RoboticsUnmanned ground vehiclesEurope (English)3044not recorded
ModashInfluencer marketing softwareUnited States (English)213411 of 36
MontonioE-shop payments and shippingEstonia (Estonian)305533 of 40
NortalPublic-sector IT servicesGermany (German)000 of 19
PactumAI procurement negotiationUnited States (English)305222 of 35
PipedriveSales CRMUnited States (English)304025 of 36
Ridango*Public transport ticketingSweden (Swedish)293823 of 29
ScoroProfessional services automationUnited Kingdom (English)19384 of 39
Skeleton TechnologiesPower systems for AI data centresUnited States (English)1130 of 40
Stargate HydrogenAlkaline electrolysersFinland (English)1010not recorded
ThreodReconnaissance dronesLithuania (Lithuanian)1928not recorded
TogglTime tracking and capacity planningUnited States (English)7171 of 36
TuumCore bankingUnited Kingdom (English)13184 of 29
VeriffIdentity verificationUnited States (English)22338 of 28
WallesterCorporate cards and spend managementUnited Kingdom (English)443 of 34
WiseBusiness accounts and international paymentsUnited Kingdom (English)30509 of 30
ZobiCart-recovery texting for ShopifyUnited States (English)000 of 36

Shortlist answers: 30 answers to the three questions that ask for a shortlist and a first choice and leave the company’s name out.

All six questions: 60 answers to the six questions that leave the company’s name out. Two of the six ask how a problem is solved and one asks which route to take, and those three do not ask for a provider.

First pick: answers that explicitly choose the company first, out of the answers that pick one provider. First picks are recorded for the 22 companies whose answers were read in full.

* Ridango is a Rankfor.AI customer. It was measured with the same method as the other 29 companies and did not commission the study.

Method and limits

  • Companies: all 30 on TOPTech30 2026 (https://top101.ee/en/tech).
  • Markets and languages: one market per company, chosen from published revenue, availability and customer evidence. Ten countries, and Europe as a whole for five defence and security companies. Seven languages: English, Estonian, German, Greek, Hungarian, Lithuanian and Swedish.
  • Questions: eight per company, fixed before collection. Six leave the company’s name, products and domains out. Two name it.
  • Engines: GPT-5.6 Sol and Gemini 3.7 Flash through their programming interfaces, web search available, low reasoning setting, one message per request, a new session each time, five repeats per question per engine.
  • Dates: between 30 September and 3 October 2026.
  • Reading the answers: named or not named is recorded for all 2,400 answers. For 22 companies, two AI coders read every answer and a third settled disagreements. All of it is automated, with no human panel.
  • Limits: these are API answers and can differ from the consumer apps. Five repeats describe these questions on these dates in one market per company. Company figures are separate measurements. The study did not test whether changing a page changes an answer.

Questions for every company and the per-company evidence files are available on request: dmitrij@rankfor.ai.

The press release, the five charts, the results table and the full method note are in the journalist kit.

People Also Ask

BeVisible Club

Get research like this before we publish it.

New AI visibility studies, ranking patterns, and source-stack data delivered to your inbox a week before they go public.

Join BeVisible Club

Want to Know How AI Sees Your Brand?

Rankfor.AI measures your brand's AI visibility across all major platforms and provides actionable recommendations.

About the Author

Dmitrij Żatuchin
Dmitrij Żatuchin

Founder

Dmitrij Żatuchin is the founder of Rankfor.AI. A computer scientist with a PhD in semantic web technologies, he bridges the gap between how AI reasons about brands and how brands want to be understood. With over two decades of software architecture experience and academic roles at Estonian Business School, Dmitrij builds the measurement infrastructure brands need to transition from optimizing for search engines to becoming visible for reasoning engines.